Re: FIN_WAIT_[1,2] and LAST_ACK
From: Brandon Erhart (berhart_at_ErhartGroup.COM)
Date: 04/05/04
- Previous message: Chuck Swiger: "Re: FIN_WAIT_[1,2] and LAST_ACK"
- In reply to: Chuck Swiger: "Re: FIN_WAIT_[1,2] and LAST_ACK"
- Next in thread: Chuck Swiger: "Re: FIN_WAIT_[1,2] and LAST_ACK"
- Reply: Chuck Swiger: "Re: FIN_WAIT_[1,2] and LAST_ACK"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2004 16:31:09 -0600 To: Chuck Swiger <cswiger@mac.com>
I want to explicitly get it out of those states, without any help from the
other end. What must I modify to achieve this?
Brandon
At 04:26 PM 4/4/2004, you wrote:
>Brandon Erhart wrote:
>[ ... ]
>>Any advice on the timeouts? I don't really care about the RFC , honestly
>>:-P. Like I said, I'm going for sheer speed.
>
>My advice was to read the RFC as it contains significant discussion about
>these timeouts, but you're free to disregard it if you please.
>
>In particular, the discussion of FIN/ACK handling is relevant, since a TCP
>implementation ought to move through the various FIN_WAIT states rapidly
>if both sides agree to close and don't have more data to send. Using
>tcpdump to verify what's going on might help you figure out why the
>connections are lingering around...
>
>--
>-Chuck
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Chuck Swiger: "Re: FIN_WAIT_[1,2] and LAST_ACK"
- In reply to: Chuck Swiger: "Re: FIN_WAIT_[1,2] and LAST_ACK"
- Next in thread: Chuck Swiger: "Re: FIN_WAIT_[1,2] and LAST_ACK"
- Reply: Chuck Swiger: "Re: FIN_WAIT_[1,2] and LAST_ACK"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]