Re: do we support non contiguous netmasks ?
From: Anders Lowinger (anders.lowinger_at_packetfront.com)
Date: 04/06/04
- Previous message: Fuhua Yin: "PIM-SM OVER FREEBSD"
- In reply to: Andre Oppermann: "Re: do we support non contiguous netmasks ?"
- Next in thread: Paul Schenkeveld: "Re: do we support non contiguous netmasks ?"
- Reply: Paul Schenkeveld: "Re: do we support non contiguous netmasks ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2004 15:27:36 +0200 To: Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org>
> You are right. I was looking to quickly. However at least my Cisco
> doesn't like it: "Bad mask 0xFFFFFD00 for address", IOS 12.2(10).
As I mentioned in my first email, Cisco only supports contignous netmasks.
I was just trying to elaborate on when/why non-contignous netmasks
would be good to have. I'm pretty sure no-one is using them....
> Never heard of that (only supernets/subnets with respect to classful
> notation), never done it and at least my Cisco 7500 doesn't like it.
> So I doubt others have got their Cisco to like it.
Correct.
This is one of the first thing they mention in the manuals.
/Anders
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Fuhua Yin: "PIM-SM OVER FREEBSD"
- In reply to: Andre Oppermann: "Re: do we support non contiguous netmasks ?"
- Next in thread: Paul Schenkeveld: "Re: do we support non contiguous netmasks ?"
- Reply: Paul Schenkeveld: "Re: do we support non contiguous netmasks ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|