Re: FIN_WAIT_[1,2] and LAST_ACK
From: Chuck Swiger (cswiger_at_mac.com)
Date: 04/06/04
- Previous message: B: "Re: SOCK_RAW sockets and IPPROTO_AH"
- In reply to: Brandon Erhart: "Re: FIN_WAIT_[1,2] and LAST_ACK"
- Next in thread: Richard Wendland: "Re: FIN_WAIT_[1,2] and LAST_ACK"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2004 12:09:11 -0400 To: Brandon Erhart <berhart@ErhartGroup.COM>
Brandon Erhart wrote:
> They are not timing out after 2MSL. I set my MSL to the lowest possible
> setting (10) as to make TIME_WAIT connections disappear. The
> FIN_WAIT_[1,2] and LAST_ACK seem to be sticking around for a while.
> However, not ALL of them stick around for a "long time"(more on this in
> a sec) -- e.g., after I kill my program, and say I've got 6,000
> connections sitting in FIN_WAIT_[1,2] or LAST_ACK, about a minute
> afterwards 90% of them have disappeared. There seem to be a few stick
> around for as long as 30 minutes or more, and in fact, a few of them
> stuck around until I rebooted the computer.
People are starting to set up honeynets or tarpits which will "persist
capture" TCP connections "forever" by responding with a zero window size.
Such things slow down the spread of worms/virii effectively, but they also
make nmap or other scanning tools (perhaps Brandon's) unhappy.
It might be interesting to retest one of these stuck connections by hand and
see whether the remote machine generates a normal response.
-- -Chuck _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: B: "Re: SOCK_RAW sockets and IPPROTO_AH"
- In reply to: Brandon Erhart: "Re: FIN_WAIT_[1,2] and LAST_ACK"
- Next in thread: Richard Wendland: "Re: FIN_WAIT_[1,2] and LAST_ACK"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|