Re: what is the story on if_index allocation ?
From: Bruce M Simpson (bms_at_spc.org)
Date: 04/20/04
- Previous message: Cyrille Lefevre: "apm and network cards"
- In reply to: Bill Fumerola: "Re: what is the story on if_index allocation ?"
- Next in thread: Petri Helenius: "Re: what is the story on if_index allocation ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 15:10:11 +0100 To: Bill Fumerola <billf@FreeBSD.org>
On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 03:43:30PM -0700, Bill Fumerola wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 12:28:23PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> > It's completely un-needed except that some standards want to access
> > interfaces by index for statitics purposes.
>
> they're "un-needed" in much the same way that statically assigning disk
> numbers is "un-needed". sure, the disks don't light on fire without it,
> but some consistancy and persistance does make things nice.
My very own AODV routing daemon uses the if_index to track interfaces going
away and coming back...
BMS
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: Cyrille Lefevre: "apm and network cards"
- In reply to: Bill Fumerola: "Re: what is the story on if_index allocation ?"
- Next in thread: Petri Helenius: "Re: what is the story on if_index allocation ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]