Re: Opinions on "best" NIC for high-touch applications
From: George V. Neville-Neil (gnn_at_neville-neil.com)
Date: 04/21/04
- Previous message: Chance Whaley: "Opinions on "best" NIC for high-touch applications"
- In reply to: Chance Whaley: "Opinions on "best" NIC for high-touch applications"
- Next in thread: _at_babolo.ru: "Re: Opinions on "best" NIC for high-touch applications"
- Reply: _at_babolo.ru: "Re: Opinions on "best" NIC for high-touch applications"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 11:36:10 -0700 To: Chance Whaley <chance@dreamscope.com>
At Wed, 21 Apr 2004 09:36:45 -0700 (PDT),
Chance Whaley wrote:
> I have an application where I am doing quite a bit of high-touch packet
> fiddling and I am looking for opinions on which "standard" Gb NIC
> has the best driver support in 5.2 or CURRENT.
>
> In my dream world I am looking for something that supports:
> - IRQ mitigation / polling (absolute must)
> - PCI-X (absolute must)
> - HW checksumming
> - Scatter / Gather
> - IPsec
> - Jumbo frames
> - VLANs
>
> Thoughts??
>
I think you want the Netear Copper Gigiabit Adapter (GA302T) which is
well supported in 5.x.
I don't know if it supports all that you want, but you should check it
out at least. The driver is if_bge.c.
Later,
George
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Chance Whaley: "Opinions on "best" NIC for high-touch applications"
- In reply to: Chance Whaley: "Opinions on "best" NIC for high-touch applications"
- Next in thread: _at_babolo.ru: "Re: Opinions on "best" NIC for high-touch applications"
- Reply: _at_babolo.ru: "Re: Opinions on "best" NIC for high-touch applications"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|