Re: BGP MD5: compatibility for STABLE?
From: Bruce M Simpson (bms_at_spc.org)
Date: 04/26/04
- Previous message: Julian Elischer: "Re: netgraph arp issues vs linux veth"
- In reply to: Eugene Grosbein: "Re: BGP MD5: compatibility for STABLE?"
- Next in thread: Eugene Grosbein: "[SPAM] BGP MD5: compatibility for STABLE?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 22:27:20 +0100 To: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.pp.ru>
On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 10:56:37PM +0800, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> It would be nice if patches where in the ports tree until they included
> in the vendor distribution. That is what ports are for, aren't they?
I haven't gotten round to this, my bad, and we're currently in freeze.
Regards
BMS
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Julian Elischer: "Re: netgraph arp issues vs linux veth"
- In reply to: Eugene Grosbein: "Re: BGP MD5: compatibility for STABLE?"
- Next in thread: Eugene Grosbein: "[SPAM] BGP MD5: compatibility for STABLE?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|