Re: Opinions on "best" NIC for high-touch applications
_at_babolo.ru
Date: 04/27/04
- Previous message: Bruce M Simpson: "Re: BGP MD5: compatibility for STABLE?"
- In reply to: George V. Neville-Neil: "Re: Opinions on "best" NIC for high-touch applications"
- Next in thread: Heinz Knocke: "Modern TCP stats"
- Reply: Heinz Knocke: "Modern TCP stats"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: "George V. Neville-Neil" <gnn@neville-neil.com> Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 06:44:20 +0400 (MSD)
> At Wed, 21 Apr 2004 09:36:45 -0700 (PDT),
> Chance Whaley wrote:
> > I have an application where I am doing quite a bit of high-touch packet
> > fiddling and I am looking for opinions on which "standard" Gb NIC
> > has the best driver support in 5.2 or CURRENT.
> >
> > In my dream world I am looking for something that supports:
> > - IRQ mitigation / polling (absolute must)
> > - PCI-X (absolute must)
> > - HW checksumming
> > - Scatter / Gather
> > - IPsec
> > - Jumbo frames
> > - VLANs
> >
> > Thoughts??
> >
>
> I think you want the Netear Copper Gigiabit Adapter (GA302T) which is
> well supported in 5.x.
>
> I don't know if it supports all that you want, but you should check it
> out at least. The driver is if_bge.c.
PR kern/61109
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Bruce M Simpson: "Re: BGP MD5: compatibility for STABLE?"
- In reply to: George V. Neville-Neil: "Re: Opinions on "best" NIC for high-touch applications"
- Next in thread: Heinz Knocke: "Modern TCP stats"
- Reply: Heinz Knocke: "Modern TCP stats"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]