Re: cuaa0&ttyd0's bug?
From: wsk (wsk_at_gddsn.org.cn)
Date: 05/20/04
- Previous message: Igor Sysoev: ""thundering herd" problem in accept"
- In reply to: Ian Smith: "Re: cuaa0&ttyd0's bug?"
- Next in thread: M. Warner Losh: "Re: cuaa0&ttyd0's bug?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 19:47:03 +0800 To: Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au>, net@freebsd.org
Ian Smith :
>Define the wiring of null-modem cable? DTR (tied to DSR) asserts CD the
>other end, either way? RTS asserts CTS the other end, either way?
>
> >
> > The behavour is intentional.
> > Your cable doesn't supply DCD signal.
>
>Or it does, but RTS/CTS aren't wired right? (if used .. so many options!)
>
> > Either use a cable with DCD suport or stay with cuaa.
> > It's OK to use cuaa if you don't need dialout support.
>
>Still depends on how cuaa0 and ttyd1 are defined, no?
>
>Cheers, Ian
>
>
>
>
yep,It's my null-modem cable's probem O:-) ,and it works excellents with
another
null-modem!thanks again!
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Igor Sysoev: ""thundering herd" problem in accept"
- In reply to: Ian Smith: "Re: cuaa0&ttyd0's bug?"
- Next in thread: M. Warner Losh: "Re: cuaa0&ttyd0's bug?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]