Re: shutdown node VS disconnect all hooks

From: Harti Brandt (harti_at_freebsd.org)
Date: 05/28/04

  • Next message: Julian Elischer: "Re: shutdown node VS disconnect all hooks" 
    Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 10:25:35 +0200 (MET DST)
To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>

    On Fri, 28 May 2004, Julian Elischer wrote:

    JE>> If you do that, I suppose you need to edit all the nodes, right?. In that
    JE>> case could you please convert the initialisation of the typestructs
    JE>> to use C99 sparse initialisation? In that case future changes will be a good
    JE>> deal easier.
    JE>
    JE>actually I don't know if you do need to edit the nodes
    JE>types.. At one time it was true that unassigned elements on
    JE>the end will be NULL.

    Sure they will, but this will confuse the next one who is adding
    a new operation. I was just thinking: 'In the case that Gleb has nothing
    else to do he could as well just take the chance...' :-)

    harti
    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"

  • Next message: Julian Elischer: "Re: shutdown node VS disconnect all hooks"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Editing /usr/include/*.h?
      ... Julian Elischer, and lo! ... it spake thus: ... There's another #define in another header you have to edit. ...
      (freebsd-hackers)
    • Re: Read-only on CD
      ... to edit the files right on the cd, then you have to burn the cd with ... gleb wrote: ... > can I conveert it to regular status ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)