Re: shutdown node VS disconnect all hooks

From: Gleb Smirnoff (glebius_at_cell.sick.ru)
Date: 05/28/04

  • Next message: Roman Kurakin: "Re: shutdown node VS disconnect all hooks"
    Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 15:15:08 +0400
    To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
    
    
    

    On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 01:31:09AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
    J> It'd be best to make the change to sparse initialisers a separate patch
    J> that I cold commit separatly,
    J> so reduce teh size of the functionality change patch.

    ... and describe this behavior in manpage.

    -- 
    Totus tuus, Glebius.
    GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE
    
    
    

    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"



  • Next message: Roman Kurakin: "Re: shutdown node VS disconnect all hooks"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: [2.6 patch] drivers/ieee1394/csr1212.c: remove dead code
      ... > It certainly cannot hurt. ... That's a separate issue so it should be a separate patch. ... > Stefan Richter ... To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: 2.6.13-rt6, ktimer subsystem
      ... > framework, from Thomas Gleixner, called 'ktimers'. ... Is that somewhere available as separate patch? ... bye, Roman ... To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)