Re: udav(4) vs. multicast
From: Christian Weisgerber (naddy_at_mips.inka.de)
Date: 06/01/04
- Previous message: Mike Silbersack: "Re: net.inet.ip.portrange.randomized=1 hurts"
- In reply to: B $B?-8c: "Re: udav(4) vs. multicast"
- Next in thread: HASHI Hiroaki: "Re: udav(4) vs. multicast"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2004 22:42:35 +0200 To: Shingo WATANABE / ?$BEOJU ?$B?-8c <nabe@nabechan.org>
Shingo WATANABE:
> I know the udav(4) was ported to FreeBSD, but I don't know why
> programming with big-endian CRC on FreeBSD.
Most likely it's just an error that was introduced when the driver
was ported.
> When I wrote this driver on NetBSD, it worked well with little-endian
> CRC.
Well, many people never use multicast at all, so bugs can go unnoticed
there for a long time.
-- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy@mips.inka.de _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Mike Silbersack: "Re: net.inet.ip.portrange.randomized=1 hurts"
- In reply to: B $B?-8c: "Re: udav(4) vs. multicast"
- Next in thread: HASHI Hiroaki: "Re: udav(4) vs. multicast"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]