Re: "netstat -m" and sendfile(2) statistics in STABLE

From: Alfred Perlstein (alfred_at_freebsd.org)
Date: 06/18/04

  • Next message: Mike Silbersack: "Re: "netstat -m" and sendfile(2) statistics in STABLE" 
    Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 23:24:18 -0700
To: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com>

    * Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com> [040617 23:20] wrote:
    >
    > On Fri, 18 Jun 2004, Igor Sysoev wrote:
    >
    > >Hi,
    > >
    > >I read objections in cvs-all@ about netstat's output after MFC
    > >of sendfile(2) statistics.
    > >
    > >How about "netstat -ms" ?
    > >
    > >Right now this switch combination is treated as simple "-m" in both -STABLE
    > >and -CURRENT.
    > >
    > >
    > >Igor Sysoev
    > >http://sysoev.ru/en/
    >
    > I would prefer that sfbufs statistics either be kept in netstat -m, OR
    > added to an entirely different program (perhaps vmstat). Making yet
    > another netstat flag just because we're scared of confusing users is a
    > noble compromise, but will in the end just make things more confusing.

    I was going to suggest vmstat now that sfbufs are used for so many
    other things than just "sendfile bufs". 

    -- 
- Alfred Perlstein
- Research Engineering Development Inc.
- email: bright@mu.org cell: 408-480-4684
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
  • Next message: Mike Silbersack: "Re: "netstat -m" and sendfile(2) statistics in STABLE"

    Relevant Pages