Re: "netstat -m" and sendfile(2) statistics in STABLE
From: Igor Sysoev (is_at_rambler-co.ru)
Date: 06/18/04
- Previous message: Mike Silbersack: "Re: "netstat -m" and sendfile(2) statistics in STABLE"
- In reply to: Mike Silbersack: "Re: "netstat -m" and sendfile(2) statistics in STABLE"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 10:43:37 +0400 (MSD) To: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com>
On Fri, 18 Jun 2004, Mike Silbersack wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Jun 2004, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>
> > I was going to suggest vmstat now that sfbufs are used for so many
> > other things than just "sendfile bufs".
> >
> > --
> > - Alfred Perlstein
>
> How about if we do this:
>
> 5.x: List sfbufs both in vmstat _and_ in netstat -m, as their status is
> relevant to both network and general memory usage.
>
> 4.x: MFC the vmstat implementation.
>
> This would preserve 4.x's behavior, but allow 5.x users (who have a new
> netstat -m output format anyway) to see sfbuf information without invocing
> multiple utilities.
In 4.x sfbufs are network buffers only and I think it's handy to see
the network buffer statistics in one place. I prefer to see netstat -ms
or netstat -m.
And nothing against additional the vmstat implementation.
Igor Sysoev
http://sysoev.ru/en/
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Mike Silbersack: "Re: "netstat -m" and sendfile(2) statistics in STABLE"
- In reply to: Mike Silbersack: "Re: "netstat -m" and sendfile(2) statistics in STABLE"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|