Re: if_sppp
From: Joerg Wunsch (j_at_uriah.heep.sax.de)
Date: 06/20/04
- Previous message: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: [TEST] natd multipath patches"
- In reply to: Roman Kurakin: "if_sppp"
- Next in thread: Roman Kurakin: "Re: if_sppp"
- Reply: Roman Kurakin: "Re: if_sppp"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2004 23:29:36 +0200 To: Roman Kurakin <rik@cronyx.ru>
As Roman Kurakin wrote:
> Problem:
> If we have max_failure < MAXALIVECNT*5 we will
> send conf-rej for magic.
> Solution:
> Loopback could be treated as a special case and
> thus we may not count it as a failure.
Can you explain a little more, please? The patch is simple enough,
yes, but offhand I don't know what's the actual problem resulting out
of the above situation.
-- cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-) _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: [TEST] natd multipath patches"
- In reply to: Roman Kurakin: "if_sppp"
- Next in thread: Roman Kurakin: "Re: if_sppp"
- Reply: Roman Kurakin: "Re: if_sppp"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]