Re: New preview patch for ipfw to pfil_hooks conversion
From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav (des_at_des.no)
Date: 06/22/04
- Previous message: Luigi Rizzo: "Re: New preview patch for ipfw to pfil_hooks conversion"
- In reply to: Maxim Konovalov: "Re: New preview patch for ipfw to pfil_hooks conversion"
- Next in thread: Maxim Konovalov: "Re: New preview patch for ipfw to pfil_hooks conversion"
- Reply: Maxim Konovalov: "Re: New preview patch for ipfw to pfil_hooks conversion"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: Maxim Konovalov <maxim@macomnet.ru> Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 11:23:47 +0200
Maxim Konovalov <maxim@macomnet.ru> writes:
> In fact, our real world tests shown the current -CURRENT comparing to
> RELENG_5_2 is in a very bad shape.
You'll have to substantiate that. All *my* real world tests show that
-CURRENT is a lot more stable and functional than RELENG_5_2.
> Is it really worth to commit that
> mostly cleanup code before say 6-CURRENT with a chance to
> destabilizate -CURRENT a bit more?
It is not simply cleanup, it is very important and long-expected
cleanup. Delaying it until after the branch will only make matters
worse, by accelerating code drift between HEAD and 5-STABLE.
DES
-- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des@des.no _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Luigi Rizzo: "Re: New preview patch for ipfw to pfil_hooks conversion"
- In reply to: Maxim Konovalov: "Re: New preview patch for ipfw to pfil_hooks conversion"
- Next in thread: Maxim Konovalov: "Re: New preview patch for ipfw to pfil_hooks conversion"
- Reply: Maxim Konovalov: "Re: New preview patch for ipfw to pfil_hooks conversion"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]