Re: New preview patch for ipfw to pfil_hooks conversion
From: Maxim Konovalov (maxim_at_macomnet.ru)
Date: 06/22/04
- Previous message: Dag-Erling Smørgrav: "Re: New preview patch for ipfw to pfil_hooks conversion"
- In reply to: Dag-Erling Smørgrav: "Re: New preview patch for ipfw to pfil_hooks conversion"
- Next in thread: Dag-Erling Smørgrav: "Re: New preview patch for ipfw to pfil_hooks conversion"
- Reply: Dag-Erling Smørgrav: "Re: New preview patch for ipfw to pfil_hooks conversion"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 13:29:52 +0400 (MSD) To: Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des@des.no>
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, 11:23+0200, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote:
> Maxim Konovalov <maxim@macomnet.ru> writes:
> > In fact, our real world tests shown the current -CURRENT comparing to
> > RELENG_5_2 is in a very bad shape.
>
> You'll have to substantiate that. All *my* real world tests show that
> -CURRENT is a lot more stable and functional than RELENG_5_2.
Yesterday -CURRENT leaks kernel memory very quickly and panics after
10 - 15 mins up. Machine is 2x3GHz Xeon, 4GB RAM, ~5000 httpd/ftpd
tcp sessions, 300-400Mbps output, ~50TB output in a day. The same
config (kernel, sysctl's, loader tunables, hardware) works well with
RELENG_5_2.
-- Maxim Konovalov _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Dag-Erling Smørgrav: "Re: New preview patch for ipfw to pfil_hooks conversion"
- In reply to: Dag-Erling Smørgrav: "Re: New preview patch for ipfw to pfil_hooks conversion"
- Next in thread: Dag-Erling Smørgrav: "Re: New preview patch for ipfw to pfil_hooks conversion"
- Reply: Dag-Erling Smørgrav: "Re: New preview patch for ipfw to pfil_hooks conversion"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|