Re: tcp_wrappers: accumulated change-request PRs

From: Hajimu UMEMOTO (ume_at_FreeBSD.org)
Date: 06/22/04

  • Next message: Bruce M Simpson: "Re: kern/23400: IPsec transport mode precludes filtering on underlying transport header" 
    Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 01:12:09 +0900
To: Bruce M Simpson <bms@spc.org>

    Hi,

    >>>>> On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 16:32:07 +0100
    >>>>> Bruce M Simpson <bms@spc.org> said:

    bms> Whilst scanning GNATS, I found a number of PRs relating to requests
    bms> for tcp_wrappers functionality and some outright bugfixes. Rather than
    bms> commit these as-is, I think we should push the changes back to Wietse,
    bms> as we maintain tcp_wrappers on a vendor branch.

    bms> The PRs in question are:
    bms> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/31034
    bms> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/32808
    bms> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=misc/36556
    bms> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=misc/42336

    bms> What does everyone else think?

    Many part of our code is already off a vender branch since IPv6
    support, and it seems Wietse doesn't maintain tcp_wrappers actively.
    So, I think it is better to integrate tcp_wrappers into our tree
    rather than maintaining it in contrib like NetBSD does.

    Sincerely, 

    --
Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama, Japan
ume@mahoroba.org  ume@{,jp.}FreeBSD.org
http://www.imasy.org/~ume/
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
  • Next message: Bruce M Simpson: "Re: kern/23400: IPsec transport mode precludes filtering on underlying transport header"