Re: tcp_wrappers: accumulated change-request PRs

From: Bjoern A. Zeeb (bzeeb-lists_at_lists.zabbadoz.net)
Date: 06/22/04

  • Next message: freebsder: "FreeBSD 5.1 DSL:Bellnet HS Network Connection Set-up Problems" 
    Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 17:18:24 +0000 (UTC)
To: Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume@FreeBSD.org>

    On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:

    > >>>>> On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 16:32:07 +0100
    > >>>>> Bruce M Simpson <bms@spc.org> said:
    >
    > bms> Whilst scanning GNATS, I found a number of PRs relating to requests
    > bms> for tcp_wrappers functionality and some outright bugfixes. Rather than
    > bms> commit these as-is, I think we should push the changes back to Wietse,
    > bms> as we maintain tcp_wrappers on a vendor branch.
    >
    > bms> The PRs in question are:
    > bms> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/31034
    > bms> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/32808
    > bms> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=misc/36556
    > bms> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=misc/42336
    >
    > bms> What does everyone else think?
    >
    > Many part of our code is already off a vender branch since IPv6
    > support, and it seems Wietse doesn't maintain tcp_wrappers actively.

    Post from Wietse (who is on Cc: as I see) about this from yesterday ...

    http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=postfix-users&m=108784059323250&w=2

    /me remebers to have sent some patches to Wietse in 2002 that luckily
    didn't get comitted though CIDR notation is pretty nice ;-) 

    -- 
Greetings
Bjoern A. Zeeb				bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
  • Next message: freebsder: "FreeBSD 5.1 DSL:Bellnet HS Network Connection Set-up Problems"