Re: RANDOM_IP_ID sysctl?

From: Xin LI (delphij_at_frontfree.net)
Date: 06/29/04

  • Next message: Tom Arnold: "ipnat/ipf state problem" 
    Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 03:43:52 +0800
To: Max Laier <max@love2party.net>

    On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 04:43:32PM +0200, Max Laier wrote:
    >
    > On Tuesday 29 June 2004 15:40, Xin LI wrote:
    > > On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 02:13:38PM +0100, David Malone wrote:
    > > > It seems to me that RANDOM_IP_ID might be better as a sysctl rather
    > > > than a kernel option. Would anyone mind if I changed this?
    >
    > I personally think that RANDOM_IP_ID is something that should be tweakable on
    > a per-interface basis (at least). I usually want randomized IDs on my uplink
    > interface while it could harm my GigE internal network due to faster ID reuse
    > cycles.

    Hmm... You are right and I concur with your idea now.

    Cheers, 

    -- 
Xin LI <delphij frontfree net>	http://www.delphij.net/
See complete headers for GPG key and other information.

  • Next message: Tom Arnold: "ipnat/ipf state problem"

    Relevant Pages