RE: device polling takes more CPU hits??
From: Don Bowman (don_at_sandvine.com)
Date: 07/26/04
- Previous message: James: "device polling takes more CPU hits??"
- Maybe in reply to: James: "device polling takes more CPU hits??"
- Next in thread: James: "Re: device polling takes more CPU hits??"
- Reply: James: "Re: device polling takes more CPU hits??"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: 'James' <haesu@towardex.com>, freebsd-net@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 10:52:23 -0400
From: James [mailto:haesu@towardex.com]
> Hi all,
>
...
>
> Any idea why device polling is kind of having... negative
> impact? Is this b/c
> I have SMP compiled on a box that really doesn't have two
> cpu's?? Is SMP+APIC_IO
> support even required for HTT use?
I would post the output of 'sysctl kern.polling', its likely
some of the tuning there is insufficient.
What do you have HZ set to (sysctl kern.clockrate)? I would
probably have it set to ~1000.
You will want 'machdep.cpu_idle_hlt=1'.
--don
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: James: "device polling takes more CPU hits??"
- Maybe in reply to: James: "device polling takes more CPU hits??"
- Next in thread: James: "Re: device polling takes more CPU hits??"
- Reply: James: "Re: device polling takes more CPU hits??"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]