Re: PPPoE problem: "Too many LQR packets lost"
From: Julian Elischer (julian_at_elischer.org)
Date: 07/27/04
- Previous message: Kelly Yancey: "RE: device polling takes more CPU hits??"
- Maybe in reply to: Stephen McKay: "PPPoE problem: "Too many LQR packets lost""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 21:14:33 -0700 To: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>
Mike Tancsa wrote:
>On Sat, 24 Jul 2004 20:42:01 -0700, in sentex.lists.freebsd.net you
>wrote:
>
>
>>>>Seriously though, mine was a very ugly hack to
>>>>get things working again for me. Most of the DSL aggregators here
>>>>are Juniper ERXes which do not play nice with FreeBSD's PPPoE.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>any thoughts as to why?
>>
>>FreeBSD's pppoe is going through a little development at the moment..
>>Now would be a good time to get it fixed..
>>
>>
>>
>Hi,
>Simple LCP echos work just fine, but when using LQR things "break".
>There are debug logs posted in the archives when I first figured out
>what was broken. If you need another copy I am happy to post again.
>
certainly it would be useful. rather than taking potsots at the archive
hoping to catch it..
pppoe is tricky because the responsibility for errors os split between
the pppoe module
and the ppp module..
>
> ---Mike
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Kelly Yancey: "RE: device polling takes more CPU hits??"
- Maybe in reply to: Stephen McKay: "PPPoE problem: "Too many LQR packets lost""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
