Re: PPPoE problem: "Too many LQR packets lost"
From: Mike Tancsa (mike_at_sentex.net)
Date: 07/27/04
- Previous message: Marko Zec: "Re: device polling takes more CPU hits??"
- In reply to: Julian Elischer: "Re: PPPoE problem: "Too many LQR packets lost""
- Next in thread: Julian Elischer: "Re: PPPoE problem: "Too many LQR packets lost""
- Reply: Julian Elischer: "Re: PPPoE problem: "Too many LQR packets lost""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 22:34:20 -0400
On Sat, 24 Jul 2004 20:42:01 -0700, in sentex.lists.freebsd.net you
wrote:
>>>Seriously though, mine was a very ugly hack to
>>>get things working again for me. Most of the DSL aggregators here
>>>are Juniper ERXes which do not play nice with FreeBSD's PPPoE.
>>>
>
>any thoughts as to why?
>
>FreeBSD's pppoe is going through a little development at the moment..
>Now would be a good time to get it fixed..
>
Hi,
Simple LCP echos work just fine, but when using LQR things "break".
There are debug logs posted in the archives when I first figured out
what was broken. If you need another copy I am happy to post again.
---Mike
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Marko Zec: "Re: device polling takes more CPU hits??"
- In reply to: Julian Elischer: "Re: PPPoE problem: "Too many LQR packets lost""
- Next in thread: Julian Elischer: "Re: PPPoE problem: "Too many LQR packets lost""
- Reply: Julian Elischer: "Re: PPPoE problem: "Too many LQR packets lost""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
