packet order, ipf or ipfw
From: Charlie Schluting (charlie_at_schluting.com)
Date: 07/28/04
- Previous message: Johan Bucht: "Re: re(4) problems (realtek 8169S)"
- Next in thread: Max Laier: "Re: packet order, ipf or ipfw"
- Reply: Max Laier: "Re: packet order, ipf or ipfw"
- Reply: Andrew Riabtsev: "Re: packet order, ipf or ipfw"
- Reply: Jeremie Le Hen: "Re: packet order, ipf or ipfw"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:23:33 -0700 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Hello..
I'm running ipf because I like it ...but now I need to use ipfw's pipe
feature. I was thinking that I could just run both, and keep all my
rules in ipf, then in ipfw: limit bandwidth for a few vlans, then allow all.
It didn't work (no rate-limiting happened).. and I'm thinking that ipf
is passing the packets and bypassing ipfw? Or something..
So, what is the order, if I'm running ipf AND ipfw at the same time?
Will it work at all in this manner?
Thanks!
-Charlie
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Johan Bucht: "Re: re(4) problems (realtek 8169S)"
- Next in thread: Max Laier: "Re: packet order, ipf or ipfw"
- Reply: Max Laier: "Re: packet order, ipf or ipfw"
- Reply: Andrew Riabtsev: "Re: packet order, ipf or ipfw"
- Reply: Jeremie Le Hen: "Re: packet order, ipf or ipfw"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|