Re[2]: packet order, ipf or ipfw (offtopic)
From: Andrew Riabtsev (resident_at_b-o.ru)
Date: 07/29/04
- Previous message: Andrew Riabtsev: "Re: packet order, ipf or ipfw"
- In reply to: Max Laier: "Re: packet order, ipf or ipfw"
- Next in thread: Max Laier: "Re: packet order, ipf or ipfw (offtopic)"
- Reply: Max Laier: "Re: packet order, ipf or ipfw (offtopic)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 11:25:27 +0400 To: Max Laier <max@love2party.net>
Hello Max,
Thursday, July 29, 2004, 1:46:06 AM, you wrote:
ML> Another alternative (on FreeBSD-current) would be pf+ALTQ, btw ;)
Is there any chance to see one day pf for 4.X-RELEASE? I'm still
thinking pf is the best firewall ever made but it is very frustrated i
can't use it on freeBSD boxes. :(
Is there some serios problem on porting pf to 4.X-RELEASE? Or it's
just a question of free time?
-- Best regards, Andrew mailto:resident@b-o.ru _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Andrew Riabtsev: "Re: packet order, ipf or ipfw"
- In reply to: Max Laier: "Re: packet order, ipf or ipfw"
- Next in thread: Max Laier: "Re: packet order, ipf or ipfw (offtopic)"
- Reply: Max Laier: "Re: packet order, ipf or ipfw (offtopic)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|