Re: packet order, ipf or ipfw
From: James (haesu_at_towardex.com)
Date: 07/30/04
- Previous message: Pawel Malachowski: "Re: packet order, ipf or ipfw"
- In reply to: Andrew Riabtsev: "Re: packet order, ipf or ipfw"
- Next in thread: Jeremie Le Hen: "Re: packet order, ipf or ipfw"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 23:35:11 -0400 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Hi all,
I was wondering for some time in a while.. How is the performance difference in
general between IPFW2 and PF in stateless rules? I know performance really is
hard to tell and depends on your environment. Are they just about the same
since stateless rules are going at linear rate of O(N) on both firewalls?
I am not trying to start a religious war or anything. Just want to get an idea
of what developers think on both packet filters in regards to stateless rules.
Thanks,
-J
-- James Jun TowardEX Technologies, Inc. Technical Lead Network Design, Consulting, IT Outsourcing james@towardex.com Boston-based Colocation & Bandwidth Services cell: 1(978)-394-2867 web: http://www.towardex.com , noc: www.twdx.net _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Pawel Malachowski: "Re: packet order, ipf or ipfw"
- In reply to: Andrew Riabtsev: "Re: packet order, ipf or ipfw"
- Next in thread: Jeremie Le Hen: "Re: packet order, ipf or ipfw"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]