Re: em driver worse then fxp driver ... why?
From: Charles Swiger (cswiger_at_mac.com)
Date: 08/10/04
- Previous message: Deepti Dhokte: "RE: IPv6 wireless stumbler"
- In reply to: Marc G. Fournier: "em driver worse then fxp driver ... why?"
- Next in thread: Marc G. Fournier: "Re: em driver worse then fxp driver ... why?"
- Reply: Marc G. Fournier: "Re: em driver worse then fxp driver ... why?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 17:41:35 -0400 To: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>
[ ...crossposting between stable and freebsd-net trimmed... ]
On Aug 10, 2004, at 4:37 PM, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> I've tried in bth half and full duplex mode .. full duplex, Ierrs
> climbs, half-duplex, Collisions climb ...
You should expect to see some collisions (1% or so) when working in
half-duplex mode: that's the nature of the beast.
Is your Linksys switch managed or unmanaged? If you can set both it
and the em to manually configured 100/FD, that would be worth trying.
I'd also try swapping a cable plugged into a working fxp box with the
machine using the em, and see whether the problems follow, or whether
the fxp system starts having issues. A bad cable or a flaky port on
the switch could also be causing your problems, but ethernet
autonegotiation failing seems to be more likely given the description.
-- -Chuck _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Deepti Dhokte: "RE: IPv6 wireless stumbler"
- In reply to: Marc G. Fournier: "em driver worse then fxp driver ... why?"
- Next in thread: Marc G. Fournier: "Re: em driver worse then fxp driver ... why?"
- Reply: Marc G. Fournier: "Re: em driver worse then fxp driver ... why?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|