Re: netgraph only on i386/ia64 - why ?

From: Ruslan Ermilov (ru_at_freebsd.org)
Date: 08/19/04

  • Next message: Scott Long: "Re: netgraph only on i386/ia64 - why ?" 
    Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 11:46:05 +0300
To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>

    On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 01:56:14PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
    [...]
    > re:
    >
    > I'll do the commit to -current today..
    > what other files should I change..?
    > UPDATING (user utilitiesw will need recompile)
    >
    UPDATING for sure, followed by a HEADS UP message to current@.

    > and I guess the 50xxxx number..
    > (where is that number again?)
    >
    src/include/sys/param.h, and document it in the Porter's Handbook.

    Cheers, 

    -- 
Ruslan Ermilov
ru@FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD committer

  • Next message: Scott Long: "Re: netgraph only on i386/ia64 - why ?"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: netgraph only on i386/ia64 - why ?
      ... I'll do the commit to -current today.. ... UPDATING (user utilitiesw will need recompile) ...
      (freebsd-net)
    • Re: netgraph only on i386/ia64 - why ?
      ... >>UPDATING (user utilitiesw will need recompile) ... > UPDATING for sure, followed by a HEADS UP message to current@. ...
      (freebsd-net)
    • Re: library problems with -CURRENT
      ... >> Compilation and installation went fine, but when I try to start firefox, ... >> Is there something i have not spotted in UPDATING? ... I think I have to recompile just everything:(with>350 packages that's a hell ...
      (freebsd-current)
    • Re: Windows XP supports RDO?
      ... Try updating the MDAC level to 2.8 and then recompile the Application. ... all I'm saying is that it _could_ help... ...
      (microsoft.public.vb.general.discussion)