Re: netgraph only on i386/ia64 - why ?

From: John Polstra (jdp_at_polstra.com)
Date: 08/20/04

  • Next message: Julian Elischer: "Re: netgraph only on i386/ia64 - why ?" 
    Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 17:57:39 -0700 (PDT)
To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>

    I dropped scottl and re from the cc list, since they're busy and asked
    us to work it out on our own.

    On 20-Aug-2004 Julian Elischer wrote:
    > Ok so what is the next number that should be used?
    > it's currently #define __FreeBSD_version 600000
    >
    > 600001?

    Yes, that would be the next number. I question whether
    __FreeBSD_version needs to be bumped at all, though, since the
    change is already reflected in NG_VERSION and NG_ABI_VERSION. Any
    port that uses netgraph would be compiled against the header files
    on the system, so I can't see how it would be useful to change
    __FreeBSD_version for this. (Not that I feel very strongly about it.)

    > here's a cut-n-paste version.. for comment..
    > it's ready to commit.

    Thanks for taking this on. I haven't tested it, but it looks good.
    Just one nit: "align" is misspelled as "allign" in the UPDATING entry.

    John
    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"

  • Next message: Julian Elischer: "Re: netgraph only on i386/ia64 - why ?"