Re: TCP SACK backport to -STABLE
From: Marko Zec (zec_at_icir.org)
Date: 08/25/04
- Previous message: Pavel Gulchouck: "Re: FIN_WAIT_2 timeout"
- In reply to: Julian Elischer: "Re: TCP SACK backport to -STABLE"
- Next in thread: Darcy Buskermolen: "Re: TCP SACK backport to -STABLE"
- Reply: Darcy Buskermolen: "Re: TCP SACK backport to -STABLE"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 15:44:18 +0200
On Wednesday 25 August 2004 00:15, Julian Elischer wrote:
> You do know don't you, that if you continue to do these things, you will
> be punnished by
> getting a CVS commit bit..?
Well, I didn't write the code myself, just ported it from -CURRENT. Anyhow,
glad to see that people still care about the 4.x branch.
Re that commit bit, what kind of commiter would that be who only likes to work
on -STABLE? :)
Cheers,
Marko
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Pavel Gulchouck: "Re: FIN_WAIT_2 timeout"
- In reply to: Julian Elischer: "Re: TCP SACK backport to -STABLE"
- Next in thread: Darcy Buskermolen: "Re: TCP SACK backport to -STABLE"
- Reply: Darcy Buskermolen: "Re: TCP SACK backport to -STABLE"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|