Re: TCP SACK backport to -STABLE
From: Darcy Buskermolen (darcy_at_wavefire.com)
Date: 08/25/04
- Previous message: Thiago Pinto Damas: "IPCOMP on IPSEC"
- In reply to: Marko Zec: "Re: TCP SACK backport to -STABLE"
- Next in thread: Oldach, Helge: "RE: TCP SACK backport to -STABLE"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 12:55:53 -0700
On August 25, 2004 06:44 am, Marko Zec wrote:
> On Wednesday 25 August 2004 00:15, Julian Elischer wrote:
> > You do know don't you, that if you continue to do these things, you will
> > be punnished by
> > getting a CVS commit bit..?
>
> Well, I didn't write the code myself, just ported it from -CURRENT. Anyhow,
> glad to see that people still care about the 4.x branch.
>
> Re that commit bit, what kind of commiter would that be who only likes to
> work on -STABLE? :)
The kind that would be liked by those who like some of the features of
-CURRENT, but policy won't allow them to put them into production...
-- Darcy Buskermolen Wavefire Technologies Corp. ph: 250.717.0200 fx: 250.763.1759 http://www.wavefire.com _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Thiago Pinto Damas: "IPCOMP on IPSEC"
- In reply to: Marko Zec: "Re: TCP SACK backport to -STABLE"
- Next in thread: Oldach, Helge: "RE: TCP SACK backport to -STABLE"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
