Re: TCP SACK backport to -STABLE

From: Paul Saab (ps_at_freebsd.org)
Date: 08/26/04

  • Next message: Muhammad Reza: "pf load balancing"
    Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 15:10:22 -0700
    To: noackjr@alumni.rice.edu
    
    

    Jon Noack wrote:

    >Eli Dart wrote:
    >
    >
    >>Careful there.....one major reason I use FreeBSD is that, compared
    >>with the other operating systems I can use, major breakages are rare.
    >>
    >>I expect the policy that prevents you from deploying the most
    >>featureful OS available is there to avoid the late-night pain
    >>required to run the latest and greatest features in production.
    >>
    >>It would be a shame if stability were lost in a rush for new
    >>features. If smarter people than I feel that SACK should be
    >>backported, great. However, I for one greatly appreciate the
    >>commitments to stability and POLA that are so much a part of FreeBSD.
    >>
    >>
    >
    >>From the Release Engineering document:
    >FreeBSD-CURRENT is the "bleeding-edge" of FreeBSD development where all
    >new changes first enter the system. FreeBSD-STABLE is the development
    >branch from which major releases are made. Changes go into this branch at
    >a different pace, and with general assumption that they have first gone
    >into FreeBSD-CURRENT and have been thoroughly tested by our user
    >community.
    >
    >These types of backports happen all the time, and having another person to
    >share the load is not a bad thing. Active maintenance of RELENG_4 is good
    >for everyone, and those interested most likely have stability as their
    >first priority anyway (because otherwise they wouldn't be using RELENG_4).
    >
    >Regardless, the original work was done on RELENG_4 and ported to -CURRENT:
    >http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src/2004-June/025956.html
    >
    >
    And bugs have been found since that time. We need more time and testing
    before anything should be backported to -stable.
    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"


  • Next message: Muhammad Reza: "pf load balancing"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: My disk I/O testing methods for FreeBSD 5.3 ...
      ... Are there any outstanding code changes that will help improve ... > the performance and questions mailing lists under the title " FreeBSD ... > Operating Systems tested: ... > the default installation options as possible with no special tuning. ...
      (freebsd-performance)
    • Re: My disk I/O testing methods for FreeBSD 5.3 ...
      ... > the performance and questions mailing lists under the title " FreeBSD ... > Operating Systems tested: ... > the default installation options as possible with no special tuning. ... > as possible test the disk I/O performance on a range of hardware, ...
      (freebsd-performance)
    • Re: [ANN] Ltk - The Lisp Toolkit
      ... > have DO-EXECUTE heavily conditionalized for various operating systems, ... > it might be better to simply eliminate START-W altogether, ... for special purposes without changing the Ltk source. ... from a FreeBSD user, as I have no FreeBSD experience of myself. ...
      (comp.lang.lisp)
    • Re: Real Insight on Performance
      ... I am looking to install Unix system for server to run ... comparisons of operating systems running MySQL or PostgreSQL to see ... But I am not convinced FreeBSD would be behind in almost all ... using Feedback networks with a mix of floating and fixed point work) ...
      (freebsd-performance)
    • Re: Memory mannagment
      ... The memory is divided into segments is that what it means? ... Tell me anything else interesting to know about memory mannagment, ... I am studying freebsd but sometimes I am ... Many of your questions can be possibly answered better by taking a computer architecture and/or operating systems course, as many of the questions and ideas you have most likely apply to real-time operating systems, including Linux, OSX, Solaris and even Windows, not just FreeBSD. ...
      (freebsd-questions)