Re: [TEST/REVIEW] Netflow implementation
From: Bjoern A. Zeeb (bzeeb-lists_at_lists.zabbadoz.net)
Date: 09/09/04
- Previous message: Andre Oppermann: "Re: [TEST/REVIEW] Netflow implementation"
- In reply to: Andre Oppermann: "Re: [TEST/REVIEW] Netflow implementation"
- Next in thread: Andre Oppermann: "Re: [TEST/REVIEW] Netflow implementation"
- Reply: Andre Oppermann: "Re: [TEST/REVIEW] Netflow implementation"
- Reply: Gleb Smirnoff: "Re: [TEST/REVIEW] Netflow implementation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2004 18:02:35 +0000 (UTC) To: Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org>
On Thu, 9 Sep 2004, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> The only thing the kernel *may* know about is the right- and leftmost AS.
> It may be more efficient to send the netflow data through a small helper
> application that just fills in the two AS number based on a mrt dump.
where and when ? that's not really possible I guess.
Gleb currently sends the flows directly via a ksocket. Of course one
could pass them to userspace but ...
One would need sth like a "callback hook" into userspace to query a
(routing) daemon before sending the flow.
I once did an ugly posix local socket based lookup patch to zebra so
traceroute could extract AS#s.
and an extra hook, if connected ask the userspace daemon (be it
the routing daemon or an intermediate) at the other end for the
AS# once the flow starts and if you get an answer fill it in;
if you don't leave it empty.
What I'd like to ask but did not because I didn't really have a
chance to view more than documentation is:
- what is the memory impact of this node ?
- can it cope with 50++ Mbit/s UDP worms scanning large subnets ?
-- Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Andre Oppermann: "Re: [TEST/REVIEW] Netflow implementation"
- In reply to: Andre Oppermann: "Re: [TEST/REVIEW] Netflow implementation"
- Next in thread: Andre Oppermann: "Re: [TEST/REVIEW] Netflow implementation"
- Reply: Andre Oppermann: "Re: [TEST/REVIEW] Netflow implementation"
- Reply: Gleb Smirnoff: "Re: [TEST/REVIEW] Netflow implementation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|