Re: [TEST/REVIEW] Netflow implementation
From: Gleb Smirnoff (glebius_at_freebsd.org)
Date: 09/09/04
- Previous message: Gleb Smirnoff: "Re: [TEST/REVIEW] Netflow implementation"
- In reply to: Bjoern A. Zeeb: "Re: [TEST/REVIEW] Netflow implementation"
- Next in thread: Gleb Smirnoff: "Re: [TEST/REVIEW] Netflow implementation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2004 23:57:25 +0400 To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net>
On Thu, Sep 09, 2004 at 06:02:35PM +0000, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
B> What I'd like to ask but did not because I didn't really have a
B> chance to view more than documentation is:
B> - what is the memory impact of this node ?
It uses a static cache (default size 65k entries). One entry takes
56 bytes, if I don't mistake.
B> - can it cope with 50++ Mbit/s UDP worms scanning large subnets ?
I haven't tried 50++ Mbit/s of worms, but it works on 100Mbit/s of live
traffic, which is full of worms. The answer is: it depends on how
large is your CPU and how quick are your worms. Try it and tell me
how it goes. :)
-- Totus tuus, Glebius. GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Gleb Smirnoff: "Re: [TEST/REVIEW] Netflow implementation"
- In reply to: Bjoern A. Zeeb: "Re: [TEST/REVIEW] Netflow implementation"
- Next in thread: Gleb Smirnoff: "Re: [TEST/REVIEW] Netflow implementation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|