locking
From: Waldemar Kornewald (Waldemar.Kornewald_at_web.de)
Date: 09/23/04
- Previous message: Waldemar Kornewald: "creating default route in kernel"
- Next in thread: Brooks Davis: "Re: locking"
- Reply: Brooks Davis: "Re: locking"
- Reply: Robert Watson: "Re: locking"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 12:22:33 +0200 To: FreeBSD-net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
Hi again,
we at the Haiku networking team are considering a port of your 5.3
netstack because it is thread-safe and making the old one (4.x, I think)
thread-safe is probably a much bigger task.
Now, I saw that the routing code seems to use macros for the locking
code. Do you use macros everywhere?
We would prefer having native threads and locks. Haiku only has
semaphores, not mutexes, is that a problem?
Could you think of some other difficulties we could run into when
porting it?
Thank you.
Bye,
Waldemar Kornewald
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Waldemar Kornewald: "creating default route in kernel"
- Next in thread: Brooks Davis: "Re: locking"
- Reply: Brooks Davis: "Re: locking"
- Reply: Robert Watson: "Re: locking"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]