Re: NOARP - gateway must answer and have frozen ARP table
From: Bill Fenner (fenner_at_research.att.com)
Date: 12/06/01
- Previous message: Roman Kurakin: "DSLAM"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2001 12:59:39 -0800 To: dwbear75@gmail.com
Garrett and I discussed what IFF_NOARP should mean about 4-5 years
ago; we decided that it probably menat "no ARP". We discussed
the idea of seperating it out into two flags; "Don't reply to ARP"
and "don't pay attention to ARP" but decided to wait and see what
people thought. 4-5 years is probably enough time to wait =)
My proposal: keep IFF_NOARP, but add IFF_NOSENDARP and IFF_NOREPLYARP
(or something, I'm no good at making up names). I agree with Louie
that it makes sense for these to be per-interface as opposed to
Ruslan's sysctl.
Bill
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Roman Kurakin: "DSLAM"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|