Re: Kernel panic with pf
From: Max Laier (max_at_love2party.net)
To: email@example.com Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 14:20:44 +0200
On Monday 25 October 2004 14:03, Gilbert Cao wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 09:27:46PM +0200, Max Laier wrote:
> > Thanks. Going to commit it.
> > > Should I also test with debug.mpsafenet=0, or is it useless ?
> > You should not use user/group rules in a debug.mpsafenet=1 environment.
> > It will cause hard lockups and the like. The fix for these lockups is
> > non- trivial and will take some more time.
> Yeah, I mean debug.mpsafenet=1 ... sorry for anyone who have
> misunderstand what I said about testing with debug.mpsafenet=0 ...
Oh nevermind! Thank you a lot for your report and testing. I was just trying
to make this point clear. I am very unhappy with the situation, but I can't
help it and hence try to educate users to not fall into that trap.
-- /"\ Best regards, | firstname.lastname@example.org \ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661 X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | mlaier@EFnet / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored