Re: Kernel panic with pf

From: Max Laier (max_at_love2party.net)
Date: 10/25/04

  • Next message: gnn_at_freebsd.org: "Updated scope6.c locking patch..." 
    To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 14:20:44 +0200

    On Monday 25 October 2004 14:03, Gilbert Cao wrote:
    > On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 09:27:46PM +0200, Max Laier wrote:
    > > Thanks. Going to commit it.
    > >
    > > > Should I also test with debug.mpsafenet=0, or is it useless ?
    > >
    > > You should not use user/group rules in a debug.mpsafenet=1 environment.
    > > It will cause hard lockups and the like. The fix for these lockups is
    > > non- trivial and will take some more time.
    >
    > Yeah, I mean debug.mpsafenet=1 ... sorry for anyone who have
    > misunderstand what I said about testing with debug.mpsafenet=0 ...

    Oh nevermind! Thank you a lot for your report and testing. I was just trying
    to make this point clear. I am very unhappy with the situation, but I can't
    help it and hence try to educate users to not fall into that trap.

    Thanks again. 

    -- 
/"\  Best regards,                      | mlaier@freebsd.org
\ /  Max Laier                          | ICQ #67774661
 X   http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/  | mlaier@EFnet
/ \  ASCII Ribbon Campaign              | Against HTML Mail and News

  • Next message: gnn_at_freebsd.org: "Updated scope6.c locking patch..."

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Kernel panic with pf
      ... Going to commit it. ... > will cause hard lockups and the like. ... The fix for these lockups is non- ... To unsubscribe, ...
      (freebsd-net)
    • Re: Kernel panic with pf
      ... On Sunday 24 October 2004 21:14, Gilbert Cao wrote: ... You should not use user/group rules in a debug.mpsafenet=1 environment. ... will cause hard lockups and the like. ... The fix for these lockups is non- ...
      (freebsd-net)