Re: arp_rtrequest() panich & patch for comments

From: Iasen Kostov (tbyte_at_OTEL.net)
Date: 10/25/04

  • Next message: lukem.freebsd_at_cse.unsw.edu.au: "poor performance of nge interface" 
    Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 19:26:06 +0300
To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org

    Pawel Malachowski wrote:

    >On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 07:12:18PM +0300, Iasen Kostov wrote:
    >
    >
    >
    >>This is the segment of code:
    >>
    >> if ((rt->rt_flags & RTF_HOST) == 0 &&
    >> SIN(rt_mask(rt))->sin_addr.s_addr != 0xffffffff)
    >> rt->rt_flags |= RTF_CLONING;
    >>
    >>
    >
    >BTW, http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/42030
    >
    >
    >
    >
    It's looks the same thing ... I think the creation of virtual devices
    like tap or tun should be anounced a bit later
    Same is for destruction may be but little earlier following the logic.

    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"

  • Next message: lukem.freebsd_at_cse.unsw.edu.au: "poor performance of nge interface"

    Relevant Pages