Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet if_ether.c
From: Bruce M Simpson (bms_at_spc.org)
Date: 10/27/04
- Previous message: Julian Elischer: "Re: Implementing IP_SENDIF (like SO_BINDTODEVICE)"
- In reply to: Gleb Smirnoff: "Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet if_ether.c"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 12:50:29 -0700 To: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org>, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org
On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 11:12:33PM +0400, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> If we are interested in tracking this down, we should add a printf,
> so that people who hit this will notce it and report.
> Otherwise this problem will be left forever in a workaround state.
That's what revision 1.109 was for, but I have only had 2 reports of this.
Once the ARP rewrite is finished, and ARP is finally separated from the
routing table, we will probably not see this any more.
My theory right now is that a sockaddr_dl is being interpreted as a
link-layer address when actually only the sdl_index field needs to be
interpreted.
BMS
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Julian Elischer: "Re: Implementing IP_SENDIF (like SO_BINDTODEVICE)"
- In reply to: Gleb Smirnoff: "Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet if_ether.c"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|