Re: PPTP/PPPoE mpd/poptop performance
From: Pawel Malachowski (pawmal-posting_at_freebsd.lublin.pl)
Date: 10/28/04
- Previous message: Gleb Smirnoff: "Re: Implementing IP_SENDIF (like SO_BINDTODEVICE)"
- In reply to: Gleb Smirnoff: "Re: PPTP/PPPoE mpd/poptop performance"
- Next in thread: Iasen Kostov: "Re: PPTP/PPPoE mpd/poptop performance"
- Reply: Iasen Kostov: "Re: PPTP/PPPoE mpd/poptop performance"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 15:13:16 +0200 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 03:38:08PM +0400, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> I'd suggest to choose PPPoE, not PPTP, because the latter is quite
> complicated and violated by some client implementation. You will
> not find any problems with PPPoE, since ng_pppoe is compatible with
> all known PPPoE implementations.
This is what I am currently looking at. I am considering PPTP only because
client is already available in Windows machines for free. While in XP PPPoE
is already in, I don't see free PPPoE clients for Win9x.
I am a bit worried about behaviour in lossy WiFi environments; I'll give it
a try in free time, I guess.
> 1) userland ppp, ~200 sessions, ~2Mbit/s. Under peak traffic load
> is significant.
> 2) mpd, 10 - 50 clients (a small net). The load is almost zero.
> Can handle wirespeed 100Mbit, with interrupt load equal to
> load on pure Ethernet routing.
Thanks.
-- Paweł Małachowski _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Gleb Smirnoff: "Re: Implementing IP_SENDIF (like SO_BINDTODEVICE)"
- In reply to: Gleb Smirnoff: "Re: PPTP/PPPoE mpd/poptop performance"
- Next in thread: Iasen Kostov: "Re: PPTP/PPPoE mpd/poptop performance"
- Reply: Iasen Kostov: "Re: PPTP/PPPoE mpd/poptop performance"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|