Re: PPTP/PPPoE mpd/poptop performance
From: Iasen Kostov (tbyte_at_OTEL.net)
Date: 10/28/04
- Previous message: Pawel Malachowski: "Re: PPTP/PPPoE mpd/poptop performance"
- In reply to: Pawel Malachowski: "Re: PPTP/PPPoE mpd/poptop performance"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 18:48:46 +0300 To: Pawel Malachowski <pawmal-posting@freebsd.lublin.pl>
Pawel Malachowski wrote:
>On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 03:38:08PM +0400, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
>
>
>
>>I'd suggest to choose PPPoE, not PPTP, because the latter is quite
>>complicated and violated by some client implementation. You will
>>not find any problems with PPPoE, since ng_pppoe is compatible with
>>all known PPPoE implementations.
>>
>>
>
>This is what I am currently looking at. I am considering PPTP only because
>client is already available in Windows machines for free. While in XP PPPoE
>is already in, I don't see free PPPoE clients for Win9x.
>I am a bit worried about behaviour in lossy WiFi environments; I'll give it
>a try in free time, I guess.
>
>
>
I use them both(PPTP and PPPoE) on every machine serving as access
concentrator - and leave decision of "what to use" to the client side :).
(btw there are PPPoE clients for win98 - RASPPPoE it was I think).
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Pawel Malachowski: "Re: PPTP/PPPoE mpd/poptop performance"
- In reply to: Pawel Malachowski: "Re: PPTP/PPPoE mpd/poptop performance"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|