Re: Implementing IP_SENDIF (like SO_BINDTODEVICE)
From: Bruce M Simpson (bms_at_spc.org)
Date: 10/29/04
- Previous message: Bruce M Simpson: "Re: Implementing IP_SENDIF (like SO_BINDTODEVICE)"
- In reply to: Bruce M Simpson: "Re: Implementing IP_SENDIF (like SO_BINDTODEVICE)"
- Next in thread: gnn_at_freebsd.org: "Re: Implementing IP_SENDIF (like SO_BINDTODEVICE)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 16:02:23 -0700 To: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org>, Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>, freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Looking at http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/701/20.html I notice a
few differences. Seems to me that a route to one of the peer's other
addresses is going to be needed, and that the supernet example given
there might not work.
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: Bruce M Simpson: "Re: Implementing IP_SENDIF (like SO_BINDTODEVICE)"
- In reply to: Bruce M Simpson: "Re: Implementing IP_SENDIF (like SO_BINDTODEVICE)"
- Next in thread: gnn_at_freebsd.org: "Re: Implementing IP_SENDIF (like SO_BINDTODEVICE)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]