Bridge--using Packet Capture Library(libpcap.a) -- efficiency ?????
From: kamal kc (rosey_kc_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 10/31/04
- Previous message: Joost Bekkers: "Re: ipfw and ipsec processing order for outgoing packets wrong"
- Next in thread: Robert Watson: "Re: Bridge--using Packet Capture Library(libpcap.a) -- efficiency ?????"
- Reply: Robert Watson: "Re: Bridge--using Packet Capture Library(libpcap.a) -- efficiency ?????"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2004 01:27:04 -0700 (PDT) To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
I have made a bridge using the Packet Capture Library
I set the two nics to promiscous mode and transfer packet
between the two packet capture handles
A piece of the code I use for initializing the packet capture device descriptor---
.....
pcap_t *pd;
pd = (pcap_t *)malloc(sizeof(*pd));
if (pd == NULL) {
printf("memory allocation error");
}
if((pd=pcap_open_live(device,BUFFSIZE,1,0,errbuf))==NULL)
{printf("pcap_open_live: %s",errbuf);
exit(1);
};
v = 1;
if (ioctl(pd->fd, BIOCIMMEDIATE, &v) < 0) {
printf("can't set BIOCIMMEDIATE");
exit(1);
}
..................
Now the problem is efficiency !!!
The RTT for a ping packet to traverse across the bridge takes a fastest of about 3ms when
run as normal process
and about 2ms when run as daemon. But when setting
gateway_enable="YES"
in rc.conf the RTT is less than 1 ms. (i.e. FreeBSD Box acting as bridge)
I have FreeBSD 5.1 BOX.
I used Packet Capture Library(libpcap.a) because I could find of none libraries in capturing packets that
could return with the ethernet header. Further I could not find good usage maunal on BPF.
In the above code setting the TIMEOUT value to 0 also didn't improve the time taken to
capture and transmit the packets across the network.
Each packet is processed by a separate thread that is envoked by the main thread listening on
the packet capture handle.
++++++++++++++++
So finally
Could anyone suggest a way on improving the time delay and making the bridge process packets faster
with improved response time.
Solutions using Packet Capture Library would be great !!
Thanks in advance
Kamal
++++++++++++++++++++
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Address AutoComplete - You start. We finish.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Joost Bekkers: "Re: ipfw and ipsec processing order for outgoing packets wrong"
- Next in thread: Robert Watson: "Re: Bridge--using Packet Capture Library(libpcap.a) -- efficiency ?????"
- Reply: Robert Watson: "Re: Bridge--using Packet Capture Library(libpcap.a) -- efficiency ?????"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]