Re: Running into an mbuf leak with bridging and tap
From: Olivier Nicole (on_at_cs.ait.ac.th)
Date: 11/23/04
- Previous message: Robert Watson: "Running into an mbuf leak with bridging and tap"
- In reply to: Robert Watson: "Running into an mbuf leak with bridging and tap"
- Next in thread: Maksim Yevmenkin: "Re: Running into an mbuf leak with bridging and tap"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 17:14:00 +0700 (ICT) To: rwatson@freebsd.org
> I'm running an ethernet over TCP bridge using a combination of the native
> ethernet bridge support and the tap driver. Basically, a daemon sits on
> /dev/tapX and bridges ethernet frames using a small header over a TCP
Yup i think I have seen the same thing while I was using a combination
of vtun (IP over IP tunnelling), tap and bridge.
As it was a one day only experiment that was not critical and I just
incresed mbuf.
Olivier
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Robert Watson: "Running into an mbuf leak with bridging and tap"
- In reply to: Robert Watson: "Running into an mbuf leak with bridging and tap"
- Next in thread: Maksim Yevmenkin: "Re: Running into an mbuf leak with bridging and tap"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]