Re: route cacheing for gif(4) should be optional
From: Gleb Smirnoff (glebius_at_freebsd.org)
Date: 11/26/04
- Previous message: Mike Silbersack: "Re: kern/72502: [patch] TCP should honour incoming RSTs even if the receive window is closed"
- In reply to: James: "Re: route cacheing for gif(4) should be optional"
- Next in thread: James: "Re: route cacheing for gif(4) should be optional"
- Reply: James: "Re: route cacheing for gif(4) should be optional"
- Reply: Andre Oppermann: "Re: route cacheing for gif(4) should be optional"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 12:13:16 +0300 To: James <haesu@towardex.com>
On Thu, Nov 25, 2004 at 09:55:10PM -0500, James wrote:
J> On Thu, Nov 25, 2004 at 05:06:41PM +0300, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
J> > Back to this problem:
J> >
J> > http://freebsd.rambler.ru/bsdmail/freebsd-net_2004/msg01305.html
J> >
J> > I've found two more people who dislike this feature of gif(4).
J> > So I'd like to make it optional.
J> >
J> > We already have LINK2 flag removing sourceroute filter from gif(4),
J> > which is commonly used in asymmetrically routed networks. I suggest
J> > to use this flag also for disabling route cacheing, since asymmetricity
J> > often appears in dynamically routed networks, and if one runs dynamic
J> > routing, he probably wants to remove route cacheing, too.
J>
J> I'd think we should create a separate option for removing the route
J> cache. Sometimes, certain people want to use the tunnel at the highest
J> maximum performance possible with both sourceroute filter disabled
J> and tunneling routes allocated at their creation time. Perhaps link3 is a
J> good place for this option?
There is no LINK3 flag :)
However, gif(4) does not use LINK0 flag. It was used in past. We can utilize
it now. Any objections?
-- Totus tuus, Glebius. GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Mike Silbersack: "Re: kern/72502: [patch] TCP should honour incoming RSTs even if the receive window is closed"
- In reply to: James: "Re: route cacheing for gif(4) should be optional"
- Next in thread: James: "Re: route cacheing for gif(4) should be optional"
- Reply: James: "Re: route cacheing for gif(4) should be optional"
- Reply: Andre Oppermann: "Re: route cacheing for gif(4) should be optional"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|