Re: (review request) ipfw and ipsec processing order for outgoingpackets

From: Andre Oppermann (andre_at_freebsd.org)
Date: 11/29/04

  • Next message: Andre Oppermann: "Re: route cacheing for gif(4) should be optional" 
    Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 16:04:20 +0100
To: Joost Bekkers <joost@jodocus.org>

    Joost Bekkers wrote:
    >
    > On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 11:14:46AM +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:
    > > >
    > > > The attached patch is against 5.3R
    > >
    > > Please post unified diffs.
    > >
    >
    > Ok, here you go.

    While this way of 'fixing' the IPSEC problem works it is rather gross
    and not very stylish. I prefer not to have this in the tree as makes
    maintainance a lot harder.

    I have some stuff wrt [Fast]IPSEC and your problem in the works and
    it should become ready around christmas time (loadable [Fast]IPSEC, at
    least for IPv4). 

    -- 
Andre
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
  • Next message: Andre Oppermann: "Re: route cacheing for gif(4) should be optional"