Re: (review request) ipfw and ipsec processing order for outgoingpackets

From: Joost Bekkers (joost_at_jodocus.org)
Date: 11/29/04

  • Next message: Andre Oppermann: "Re: (review request) ipfw and ipsec processing order for outgoingpackets" 
    Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 18:49:54 +0100
To: Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org>

    On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 04:04:20PM +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:
    > Joost Bekkers wrote:
    > >
    > > On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 11:14:46AM +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:
    > > > >
    > > > > The attached patch is against 5.3R
    > > >
    > > > Please post unified diffs.
    > > >
    > >
    > > Ok, here you go.
    >
    > While this way of 'fixing' the IPSEC problem works it is rather gross
    > and not very stylish. I prefer not to have this in the tree as makes
    > maintainance a lot harder.
    >

    I totaly agree that it is not pretty. I was trying to avoid duplicating
    the code (so every change would have to be made twice) and making it a
    function didn't sit right for some reason. Hints/tips for dealing with
    this kind of situation are welcome, but maybe better off-list.

    > I have some stuff wrt [Fast]IPSEC and your problem in the works and
    > it should become ready around christmas time (loadable [Fast]IPSEC, at
    > least for IPv4).
    >

    Looking forward to it. 

    -- 
greetz Joost
joost@jodocus.org
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
  • Next message: Andre Oppermann: "Re: (review request) ipfw and ipsec processing order for outgoingpackets"