Re: Working on howl port

From: Andrea Campi (andrea+freebsd_net_at_webcom.it)
Date: 12/13/04

  • Next message: B: "Re: KAME mip6"
    Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 10:06:09 +0100
    To: Peter Heerboth <pheerboth@apple.com>
    
    

    On Sun, Dec 12, 2004 at 03:25:27PM -0800, Peter Heerboth wrote:
    > I'm not a zeroconf expert per se, but I would love to see FreeBSD have
    > a great zeroconf implementation. Here are some things to think about.
    >
    > >
    > >If your first implementation happens to leave the interface with a
    > >169.254 IP address, it's doing something it shouldn't, however that is
    > >likely to be mostly harmless until you or someone has a chance to
    > >improve the implementation.
    >
    > If a device does keep its link local address once it obtains a lease
    > from a DHCP server or the user manually enters an address, it is
    > important that it stops responding to A record queries with its
    > 169.254/16 address. Depending upon the IP implementations of the other

    Sure, I'll make sure this is going to work fine. But I need some
    time before I can really work on mDNS ;-)

    > Also, how is Freebsd going to handle IPv4 link local addresses on
    > multi-homed hosts? Does FreeBSD have a notion of a "primary" interface
    > like Mac OS X? If FreeBSD assigns v4 link-local address to all its
    > interfaces, then the link-local address for each device on each network
    > to which my FreeBSD device is attached must be unique across all
    > networks, or the routing implications are obvious.

    I'd like to live complications such as this for a later stage. I'd say
    if you have a multihomed machine you better know how to configure it;
    the primary target for my work are laptops and other clients. That is
    not to say I don't care; rather, I need to limit how much I chew at a
    time. For now I only work on one interface.

    Bye,
            Andrea

    -- 
    Actually, Microsoft is sort of a mixture between the Borg and the Ferengi.
    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
    

  • Next message: B: "Re: KAME mip6"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Multiple Interfaces
      ... >> the same subnet, which is what your included config shows. ... That interface can't be default gateway. ... you have two interfaces on the same network. ... implementation details on the various FreeBSD network stacks. ...
      (freebsd-net)
    • Re: sendto: No buffer space available
      ... > I use a freebsd box as a gateway for my home network. ... > When my ISP is having network problems, I will get the precise same issue. ... Taking down the interface might clear the buffers... ... > Subject: sendto: No buffer space available ...
      (freebsd-isp)
    • Re: sendto: No buffer space available
      ... > I use a freebsd box as a gateway for my home network. ... > When my ISP is having network problems, I will get the precise same issue. ... Taking down the interface might clear the buffers... ... > Subject: sendto: No buffer space available ...
      (freebsd-questions)
    • Re: Working on howl port
      ... I'm not a zeroconf expert per se, but I would love to see FreeBSD have ... devices on the network, the freebsd box may appear unreachable. ... hostname by interface, but I'm not sure how many people are this ...
      (freebsd-net)
    • RE: Freebsd Theme Song
      ... from the network into the ethernet receiver. ... It takes a certain amount of time to get the packet out of ... At low data rates polling is less ... >Subject: Re: Freebsd Theme Song ...
      (freebsd-questions)