Re: PPPoE problem: "Too many LQR packets lost"

From: Brian Somers (brian_at_Awfulhak.org)
Date: 12/16/04

  • Next message: Mitch (Bitblock): "RE: Load Balancing"
    Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 16:00:58 +0000
    To: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>
    
    

    On Sun, 08 Aug 2004 13:01:00 -0400, Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> wrote:
    > On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 21:14:33 -0700, in sentex.lists.freebsd.net you
    > wrote:
    >
    > >Mike Tancsa wrote:
    > >
    > >>On Sat, 24 Jul 2004 20:42:01 -0700, in sentex.lists.freebsd.net you
    > >>wrote:
    > >>
    > >>
    > >>>>>Seriously though, mine was a very ugly hack to
    > >>>>>get things working again for me. Most of the DSL aggregators here
    > >>>>>are Juniper ERXes which do not play nice with FreeBSD's PPPoE.
    > >>>>>
    > >>>>>
    > >>>>>
    > >>>any thoughts as to why?
    > >>>
    > >>>FreeBSD's pppoe is going through a little development at the moment..
    > >>>Now would be a good time to get it fixed..
    > >>Hi,
    > >>Simple LCP echos work just fine, but when using LQR things "break".
    > >>There are debug logs posted in the archives when I first figured out
    > >>what was broken. If you need another copy I am happy to post again.
    > >>
    > >
    > >certainly it would be useful. rather than taking potsots at the archive
    > >hoping to catch it..
    > >
    > >pppoe is tricky because the responsibility for errors os split between
    > >the pppoe module
    > > and the ppp module..
    >
    >
    > Just to followup for the archives sake, the latest LQR changes do not
    > fix the ppp/PPPoE problem with respect to the issue below. I have a
    > full TCPDUMP as well as ppp debug logs that illustrate the problem for
    > anyone interested.
    >
    > ---Mike

    And for the archive's sake... ppp has now grown an ``enable echo''
    command (in -current).

    -- 
    Brian <brian@Awfulhak.org>                        <brian@[uk.]FreeBSD.org>
          <http://www.Awfulhak.org>                   <brian@[uk.]OpenBSD.org>
    Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour !
    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
    

  • Next message: Mitch (Bitblock): "RE: Load Balancing"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: PPPoE problem: "Too many LQR packets lost"
      ... >>There are debug logs posted in the archives when I first figured out ... >the pppoe module ... Just to followup for the archives sake, the latest LQR changes do not ... fix the ppp/PPPoE problem with respect to the issue below. ...
      (freebsd-net)
    • Re: PPPoE problem: "Too many LQR packets lost"
      ... >FreeBSD's pppoe is going through a little development at the moment.. ... Simple LCP echos work just fine, but when using LQR things "break". ... There are debug logs posted in the archives when I first figured out ... To unsubscribe, ...
      (freebsd-net)
    • Re: PPPoE problem: "Too many LQR packets lost"
      ... Mike Tancsa wrote: ... >>FreeBSD's pppoe is going through a little development at the moment.. ... >There are debug logs posted in the archives when I first figured out ... the pppoe module ...
      (freebsd-net)