RE: Load Balancing
From: Mitch (Bitblock) (mitch_at_bitblock.com)
Date: 12/16/04
- Previous message: Mike Jakubik: "RE: Load Balancing"
- In reply to: Mike Jakubik: "RE: Load Balancing"
- Next in thread: Elton Machado: "Re: Load Balancing"
- Reply: Elton Machado: "Re: Load Balancing"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: "'Mike Jakubik'" <mikej@rogers.com> Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 13:30:08 -0800
>
> Why dont you all do yourselves a favor and go out and buy one of those
> home dsl/cable modems that have 2 ports and provide load balancing
> instead.
>
[Mitch says:]
The only ones I've seen were rather expensive and aren't modem's - they are
routers... so you have to still have your ADSL modem, your cable modem, your
load balancing router, which generally does a poor job, and has all kinds of
limitations...
Why spend $500 bucks on a load shared with an inadequate non-open source
firewall that doesn't do what I want and then have to add a firewall anyways
;-)
And worse, it works in NAT mode, and probably screws up ipsec, and traffic
shaping too...
Is that enough reasons to try building a better mousetrap?
m/
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Mike Jakubik: "RE: Load Balancing"
- In reply to: Mike Jakubik: "RE: Load Balancing"
- Next in thread: Elton Machado: "Re: Load Balancing"
- Reply: Elton Machado: "Re: Load Balancing"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|