Re: firewalling with tunnels, and/or ipv6
From: Brooks Davis (brooks_at_one-eyed-alien.net)
Date: 12/21/04
- Previous message: gnn_at_FreeBSD.org: "Re: Dingo and PerForce"
- In reply to: Charlie Schluting: "firewalling with tunnels, and/or ipv6"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 21:55:29 -0800 To: Charlie Schluting <charlie@schluting.com>
On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 06:05:16PM -0800, Charlie Schluting wrote:
> Ok, I've got a v6 tunnel, and to make it work I had to "allow ipv6 from
> <endpoint>" in ipfw. From what I understand, I have to make a completely
> different set of rules for ipv6, and load them using the -6 flag.
>
> Correct so far?
ip6fw is an entierly different beast from ipfw. There is no -6 option
to ipfw. Use ip6fw instead. If 6.x we should have ipv6 support in ipfw
and ip6fw should be gone.
-- Brooks
-- Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: gnn_at_FreeBSD.org: "Re: Dingo and PerForce"
- In reply to: Charlie Schluting: "firewalling with tunnels, and/or ipv6"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
